Egypt Wants To Torture, U.S. Enthusiastically Helps: "'Grave breaches' (war crimes) subject to universal jurisdiction"
[The] CIA's substation chief in
… During their search of Lady's home, police found a disk with a digital photograph of Nasr, showing him walking along the same block in Milan where he was abducted a month after the picture was taken.
…Lady, who retired from the CIA a year later, is one of the 22 alleged CIA operatives who have been charged with kidnapping in the case.
…Last week, Italian Judge Enrico Manzi…wrote that the evidence taken from Lady's home “removes any doubt about his participation in the preparatory phase of the abduction [after which Nasr would be sent back to
Craig Whitlock, “CIA Ruse Is Said to Have Damaged Probe in
…The prohibition against torture is firmly established under international human rights law. It is prohibited by various treaties to which the
International humanitarian law (the laws of war), which applies during armed conflict, prohibits the torture or other mistreatment of captured combatants and others in captivity, regardless of their legal status. Regarding prisoners-of-war, article 17 of the Third Geneva Convention of 1949 states: “No physical or mental torture, nor any other form of coercion, may be inflicted on prisoners of war to secure from them information of any kind whatever. Prisoners of war who refuse to answer may not be threatened, insulted, or exposed to any unpleasant or disadvantageous treatment of any kind.” Detained civilians are similarly protected by article 32 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. The
…Article 75 (“Fundamental Guarantees”) of the First Additional Protocol to the Geneva Conventions, which is recognized as restating customary international law, provides that “torture of all kinds, whether physical or mental” against “persons who are in the power of a Party to the conflict and who do not benefit from more favorable treatment under the [Geneva] Conventions,” shall “remain prohibited at any time and in any place whatsoever, whether committed by civilian or military agents.” “[C]ruel treatment and torture” of detainees is also prohibited under common article 3 to the 1949 Geneva Conventions, which is considered indicative of customary international law.
It is a violation of international law not only to use torture directly, but also to be complicit in torture committed by other governments. …The Convention against Torture provides in article 4 that all acts of torture, including “an act by any person which constitutes complicity or participation in torture,” is an offense “punishable by appropriate penalties which take into account their grave nature.”
…the Convention against Torture…in article 3 states: “No State Party shall expel, return (‘refouler') or extradite a person to another State where there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be in danger of being subjected to torture…. For the purpose of determining whether there are such grounds, the competent authorities shall take into account all relevant considerations including, where applicable, the existence in the State concerned of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights.”
The U.S. Department of State annual report on human rights practices has frequently criticized torture in countries where detainees may have been sent. These include
Direct involvement or complicity in torture, as well as the failure to prevent torture, may subject
The willful torture or inhuman treatment of prisoners-of-war or other detainees, including “willfully causing great suffering or serious injury to body or health,” are “grave breaches” of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, commonly known as war crimes. Grave breaches are subject to universal jurisdiction, meaning that they can be prosecuted in any national criminal court and as well as any international tribunal with appropriate jurisdiction.
The Convention against Torture obligates States Parties to prosecute persons within their jurisdiction who are implicated or complicit in acts of torture. This obligation includes the prosecution of persons within their territory who committed acts of torture elsewhere and have not be extradited under procedures provided in the convention.
Should senior
There are two forms of command responsibility: direct responsibility for orders that are unlawful and imputed responsibility, when a superior knows or should have known of crimes committed by a subordinate acting on his own initiative and fails to prevent or punish them. All states are obliged to bring such people to justice.
…The
Human Rights Watch Letter to President George W. Bush, Colin Powell, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice. Human Rights Watch. Kenneth Roth, Executive Director.
Comments on "Egypt Wants To Torture, U.S. Enthusiastically Helps: "'Grave breaches' (war crimes) subject to universal jurisdiction""